After a great game of Eden+Fractal, we play cagendas. Six topics were proposed and the council approved Gavriel’s proposal to try a Sociocratic Governance method for discussing proposals!
- Cagendas Overview
- Proposals Approved
- Use the basics of Sociocratic Governance meetings for proposal discussions in Eden Fractal
- Related Resources
- Cagendas Topics
- TP31- Eden Fractal’s mission is to foster collaboration, create public goods, and build personal connections amongst EOS community members
- TP31 - MISSION PROPOSAL: To foster an open and collaborative environment of the community, preventing its capture by centralization using technology and processes, to decentralize control of our communal spaces.
- T31 - Should we initiate an Eden Fractal Participant Agreement with simple clauses to ensure that everyone speaks English, explicitly consents that videos are shared publicly, and understands the timing of events?
- T31 - Eden Fractal 2022 year in review and vision for 2023
- How should we proceed with the eden.fractal msig?
- Related Posts
- Eden Fractal 28
- Eden Fractal 29
- Eden Fractal 30
- Eden Town Hall 31 - Puppets, Proxies, & Evolution!
- Thanks for watching! Enjoy!
Date: January 4th, 2023
2:00 Lennie suggests dates should be added to videos for better accountability
2:40 Dan agrees and will add dates in show notes. Shares screen to show up coming proposals. Gavriel’s proposal about Sociocratic Governance is most popular. Dan made several proposals and Perry also is making a proposal.
The group splits into 2 breakout rooms!
9:25 Vlad’s focusing on smart contracts for ZEOS fractal and explains how he’s improving decentralized cooperation with many exciting new features
11:35 Tadas shares his screen to show telegram tool he is creating to help fractal consensus games with telegram. He demonstrates new features. sample.
16:31 Vlad asks Tadas: how does it link zoom account?
16:51 Tadas replies that currently it does not link to external accounts and he will probably add button to work with anchor. Thinking to link with Consortium…
18:10 Vlad responds to Tadas: he’s thinking about telegram+consortium integration and asks if code is public
18:38 Tadas states it’s not deployed and the code is public. He will share a link and place where completed version will be deployed
19:11 Dan asks Tadas: Does this telegram integration work with Albedo and Fernament (slow blockchains)? Also asks if Tadas is familiar with the telegram bot from Luka Percic?
20:07 Tadas details how it relates to Albedo and Eden fractal. Aware of Luka’s work and Tadas states his design is for a different purpose.
22:17 Perry created a proposal for a mission that kind of integrates with Vlad’s proposal. Added more specificity. Goes in details on his proposal
30:41 Vlad responds to Perry, sees Perry’s proposal like two circles, speaks of media and marketing departments
32:29 Perry asks whether the plan is to make circles inside of Eden, thinks each fractal should be on its own. Eden on EOS should be simple
34:59 Vlad shares thoughts on circles and says it depends how circles are defined
35:27 Dan comments schedule needs to be kept, remind everyone of time
37:30 Marco shares his work on an end of year article covering fractally genesis, Eden fractal, and more
39:09 Dan explains how breakout rooms work to Victor
40:15 Victor turns on his camera and introduces himself. He is from Uganda and has worked with EOS nation and EOS Bees. He speaks of educating the poor and organizing meetings
45:45 Dan shares his work on Eden fractal videos, tweets, promotions, Eden town hall updates, and topic proposals
56:37 Dan lost internet and parts of the recording were lost. A graphic explains what happened at this point in the video
57:00 Dan commented that recording had not be done past 30 minutes, error on his part. Explained that the last 30 minutes focused on discussions about Gavriel’s proposal. Apologized for not recording
57:37 Elias asks: how does proposal differ from holocracy? Are other chains using this?
58:11 Gavriel responds: holocracy is a business application of sociocracy. Sociocracy is used by multiple organizations. Four suggested rounds comes from Sociocracy. He believes the use of sociocratic governance is missing from general blockchain community.
1:01:29 Elias asks question to clarify proposal
1:03:43 Dan states that enough delegates are present so a vote is possible.
1:04:59 Marco comments that the mission proposal hasn’t been adopted. Believes mission statement delay until next week. Gives his opinion Gavriel’s proposal and thinks we should approve a mission statement first
1:07:40 Gavriel explains 4 step process with opportunities for listening, clarifying, understanding, reacting, and integrating
1:08:56 Tadas comments on how Gavriel’s proposal integrates with their current system, feels it similar to moderator guidelines which has already been passed
1:09:31 Gavriel responds to Tadas
1:09:55 Tadas asks for clarification on the need for 4 rounds
1:10:54 Dan shares Vlad’s comment from chat that we test it and add to the moderator guidelines if it works well. Dan agrees it is similar to moderator guidelines. Referred people to detailed messages in telegram chat. It’s not binding to try and refine.
1:12:31 Elias asks if Hypha DAO use this concept and what are step recommendations
1:12:52 Gavriel responds to Elias: Hypha uses holocracy derivative of sociocracy.
1:14:39 Elias comments third round seems like integration, table it and leave it for following week.
1:15:03 Dan commented whether vote or hold for next week, informal tryout?
1:15:50 Marco commented how genesis fractal came to consensus, strongly believes we should focus on purpose.
1:18:10 Gavriel responds to Marco on whether his proposal causes harm, comments about accepting Vlad’s mission proposal
1:19:03 Dan reads out chat comments from Vlad, Tadas, Elias. Explains how this could be added to moderator guidelines with an informal trial first. Asks delegate if they want to do quick vote first.
1:22:06 Perry comments consensus vs consent
1:23:19 Questions about if the moderator may get more power, if it is more centralized, may need mediator?
1:24:02 Dan suggests vote on proposal and reads out Tadas comment to vote on the proposal as informal guideline.
1:26:19 Dan shares the screen as Tadas counts votes on the spreadsheet. Gavriel’s proposal passed as informal moderation guideline.
1:27:54 Tadas responds to Marco that proposal does not feel it centralizes moderator power
1:28:41 Marco responds that we just gave power to moderator without going through consortium
1:29:52 Dan comments that they already have moderator guidelines and elected moderator. This doesn’t add additional power.
1:30:04 Marco explains his opinion of how this will affect votes and how the moderator has more control.
1:30:40 Eric comments that moderator already had this process approved, Dan could have done this on his own. It’s already in power of moderator
1:31:41 Dan gives an explanation of moderator guidelines, explains a little more on proposal just accepted. This proposal just adds more detail to moderator role.
1:33:40 Tadas gave his opinion: new power is not added by this proposal, it just adds to guidelines
1:34:47 Dan responds moderator is just to help guide conversation. Doesn’t feel any risk to community. Next week they’ll try new proposal, if it goes well it will be incorporated into moderator guidelines
1:37:17 Dan mentions the meeting starting next by Reiki, which most of community plans on attending
The main topic of discussion was Gavriel’s proposal to use the basics of Sociocratic Governance meetings for proposal discussions in Eden Fractal. There were also 5 other topics proposed that we did not have time to discuss this week. You can see all of these topics and proposals below.
Use the basics of Sociocratic Governance meetings for proposal discussions in Eden Fractal
Make Good Decisions Faster: Move from Consensus to Consent | By Gustavo Razzetti
Making perfect decisions is impossible, especially in times of unprecedented change. Smart organizations realize that a single leader can't have all the answers - they need to tap into the collective wisdom to find what's best for the company. However, building consensus takes a long time and usually ends up with mediocre solutions.
Governance Meetings - Holacracy
Check-In This round is a space for every participant to call out any distractions and get present for the meeting. Everyone speaks, one at a time. Administrative Concerns (Not included in Constitution Version 5.0) A simple space to triage any administrative and logistical issues to take into account for the meeting.
TP31- Eden Fractal’s mission is to foster collaboration, create public goods, and build personal connections amongst EOS community members
TP31 - MISSION PROPOSAL: To foster an open and collaborative environment of the community, preventing its capture by centralization using technology and processes, to decentralize control of our communal spaces.
T31 - Should we initiate an Eden Fractal Participant Agreement with simple clauses to ensure that everyone speaks English, explicitly consents that videos are shared publicly, and understands the timing of events?
(Patrick made a great point that this proposal was not worded correctly. Sorry for any confusion, will improve in the future!)
How do we cooperate after playing Eden+Fractal? We approved 3 proposals to optimize post-breakout room meetings, set moderator guidelines, and elect a moderator! Voilà! 👌🏽🎄
After a fun game of Eden+Fractal, the group plays Vlalendas for the first time and explores a foundational topic proposed by Vlad: What is the mission of Eden Fractal?
Is Eden Fractal's mission to foster collaboration and build personal connections amongst EOS community members? Talented newcomers join the Eden+Fractal games then we play cagendas and discuss Vlad's new proposal! 🙌🏽
Happy new year! We welcome the new year with thoughts about puppets, evolutionary psychology, personal reflections, Eden Smart Proxy, and Eden Fractal! 🥳
Music by Kjartan Abel. More details at EdenCreators.com/attributions